MCQ: Vomiting in a neonate | ABGs interpretation

Clinical Scenario: 5 week old | Vomiting | Poor weight gain | ABGs

A 5-week-old male infant is brought to the emergency department with progressive vomiting for the last 10 days. The vomiting is forceful and occurs shortly after feeds but does not contain bile. The mother reports that the infant remains hungry after vomiting but has poor weight gain. On examination, he appears dehydrated with dry mucous membranes and reduced urine output. A small firm mass is palpable in the upper abdomen. Laboratory investigations show serum sodium 132 mmol/L, potassium 2.8 mmol/L, chloride 82 mmol/L, and bicarbonate 38 mmol/L. Arterial blood gas analysis shows:

  • pH: 7.52
  • PaCO₂: 48 mmHg
  • HCO₃⁻: 38 mmol/L

Which of the following best describes his acid–base disturbance?

A. Metabolic alkalosis with appropriate respiratory compensation
B. Metabolic alkalosis with additional respiratory acidosis
C. Respiratory alkalosis with metabolic compensation
D. Normal anion gap metabolic acidosis with respiratory compensation
E. Mixed metabolic alkalosis and metabolic acidosis

Correct answer & Explanation:

Correct Answer

A. Metabolic alkalosis with appropriate respiratory compensation

Detailed Explanation: Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis | Acid base imbalance 

This infant has features suggestive of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis:

  • Age 2–8 weeks
  • Progressive projectile non-bilious vomiting
  • Persistent hunger after vomiting
  • Poor weight gain
  • Dehydration
  • Palpable upper abdominal mass

The question is testing recognition of the typical acid–base abnormality associated with repeated gastric vomiting.

Step 1: Identify the primary acid–base disorder

The pH is 7.52, indicating alkalemia.

The bicarbonate level is elevated:

  • Normal HCO₃⁻: 22–26 mmol/L
  • Patient HCO₃⁻: 38 mmol/L

Therefore, the primary disorder is:

Metabolic alkalosis

Step 2: Assess respiratory compensation

In metabolic alkalosis, expected respiratory compensation can be estimated:

Expected PaCO₂ = 0.7 × increase in HCO₃⁻ + 40 ± 5

Increase in bicarbonate:

38 − 24 = 14 mmol/L

Expected PaCO₂:

0.7 × 14 + 40

= 49.8 mmHg

Expected range:

Approximately 45–55 mmHg

Measured PaCO₂:

48 mmHg

Therefore, respiratory compensation is appropriate.

The final interpretation is:

Metabolic alkalosis with appropriate respiratory compensation

Mechanism of metabolic alkalosis in pyloric stenosis

Repeated vomiting causes loss of gastric hydrochloric acid:

Loss of hydrogen ions (H⁺)

Metabolic alkalosis

Loss of chloride ions (Cl⁻)

Hypochloremia

Volume depletion activates the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system:

Increased renal sodium retention

Increased potassium and hydrogen ion excretion

Hypokalemia and persistence of alkalosis

Why the other options are incorrect

B. Metabolic alkalosis with additional respiratory acidosis

Incorrect.

The elevated PaCO₂ may suggest respiratory acidosis, but it is actually appropriate compensation for metabolic alkalosis. A respiratory acidosis would have a PaCO₂ higher than the expected compensatory range.

C. Respiratory alkalosis with metabolic compensation

Incorrect.

Respiratory alkalosis requires a reduced PaCO₂. This patient has an elevated PaCO₂.

D. Normal anion gap metabolic acidosis with respiratory compensation

Incorrect.

Metabolic acidosis would produce a low bicarbonate level. This patient has significant bicarbonate elevation.

E. Mixed metabolic alkalosis and metabolic acidosis

Incorrect.

There is no evidence of an additional metabolic acidosis. The bicarbonate level and clinical picture are consistent with pure metabolic alkalosis.

CPSP Pearls

  • Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis classically causes hypochloremic, hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis.
  • Gastric vomiting causes loss of hydrogen ions and chloride ions.
  • Volume depletion activates aldosterone, causing renal potassium and hydrogen ion loss, maintaining alkalosis.
  • Before pyloromyotomy, correction of dehydration and electrolyte abnormalities is essential.
  • In acid–base questions, always differentiate:
    1. Primary disorder
    2. Expected compensation
    3. Evidence of a mixed disorder
Scroll to Top